Question 1

What is the definition of a 'conclusion' in an LSAT logical reasoning argument?

Accepted Answer

The conclusion is the main claim the argument is trying to establish or prove, supported by the premises. It is what the author wants you to believe based on the evidence provided.

Question 2

What is the role of a 'premise' in an LSAT logical reasoning argument?

Accepted Answer

A premise is a statement offered as evidence or support for the conclusion. Premises are accepted as true for the purposes of the argument and provide the reasoning behind the main claim.

Question 3

What is an 'intermediate conclusion' (also called a sub-conclusion) in an LSAT argument?

Accepted Answer

An intermediate conclusion is a statement that is supported by at least one premise and itself serves as support for the main conclusion. It functions as both a conclusion and a premise within the same argument.

Question 4

What is the difference between a 'sufficient condition' and a 'necessary condition' in LSAT conditional logic?

Accepted Answer

A sufficient condition guarantees the occurrence of another condition (if A then B). A necessary condition must be present for another condition to occur, but does not guarantee it (B requires A, but A alone does not guarantee B).

Question 5

What is the contrapositive of the conditional statement 'If A, then B'?

Accepted Answer

The contrapositive is 'If not B, then not A.' The contrapositive is logically equivalent to the original conditional statement and is always valid.

LSAT Logical Reasoning Mastery

Also Included in the Study Bundle

Practice Tests

Study Guides

Match Game

Try These Cards

Want to keep studying?

Related Study Decks

LSAT Argument Structure

LSAT Flawed Reasoning: Master the 27 Most Tested Logical Fallacies

LSAT Formal Logic Mastery

LSAT Inference & Assumption Flashcards

LSAT Law School Admission Test — Complete Bundle

LSAT Logic Games Mastery

Ready for the full exam?